Bleach Wiki
Bleach Wiki
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
 
:It was probably removed because all profile pics need to be discussed and approved before changed--[[User:Godisme|<font color="black" face="Verdana">'''Godisme'''</font>]] [[User talk:Godisme|<font color="black" face="Verdana">(Talk)</font>]] 03:47, April 20, 2010 (UTC)
 
:It was probably removed because all profile pics need to be discussed and approved before changed--[[User:Godisme|<font color="black" face="Verdana">'''Godisme'''</font>]] [[User talk:Godisme|<font color="black" face="Verdana">(Talk)</font>]] 03:47, April 20, 2010 (UTC)
 
::Oh Ok. Sorry about that then--[[User:Darknesslover5000|Dusk-sama]] 03:49, April 20, 2010 (UTC)
 
::Oh Ok. Sorry about that then--[[User:Darknesslover5000|Dusk-sama]] 03:49, April 20, 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
Not to mention that it's against the Image Policy to "update" existing images with images that bear no resemblance to the image they're trying to replace. [[User:Arrancar109|<font color="teal" size="2px">'''Arrancar109'''</font>]] [[User talk:Arrancar109|<font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)</font>]] 03:53, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:53, 20 April 2010

Why not just make this a sub category on the Rukia page, since it doesn't have much info on it anyways.? Shuhei Hisagi

Under normal circumstances, yes, but one of the few reasons why I actually started the article is that Dark Rukia exists outside of manga canon and is a movie-only character (like Senna and Sōjirō Kusaka. Right now, it is a stub, but like several small characters (like Jai and Todo), the article can be expanded. It's probably easier for a majority of the article editors to watch the movie first (which is going to be difficult until Dattebayo imports it). Arrancar109 20:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

pic

coulda sworn I changed the profile pic on Dark Rukia. What happened to it? --Dusk-sama 03:45, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

It was probably removed because all profile pics need to be discussed and approved before changed--Godisme (Talk) 03:47, April 20, 2010 (UTC)
Oh Ok. Sorry about that then--Dusk-sama 03:49, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Not to mention that it's against the Image Policy to "update" existing images with images that bear no resemblance to the image they're trying to replace. Arrancar109 (Talk) 03:53, April 20, 2010 (UTC)